Two Kinds of Social Epistemology
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review
Steve Fuller’s programme of Social Epistemology was initiated some 25 years ago with the launching of a journal and the publication of a monograph with those very words as their title. Since then, the programme has evolved in a constant critical dialogue with other players in the fields of epistemology and science studies. Fuller’s main confrontation has been with analytic epistemology which, in its classical form, adopts a contrary position on most key issues. However, analytic epistemologists have gradually moved in the direction of Fuller’s views and even adopted the term “social epistemology” for their emerging position. Still, substantial disagreement remains between the two identically named programmes with regard to the proper philosophical approach to knowledge as a social phenomenon; in this article, I try to pinpoint the locus of this disagreement. However, Fuller has also been engaged in minor skirmishes with his Science Studies fellows; I also examine these clashes. Finally, I express my wishes concerning the future direction of social epistemology
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 8 |
Pages (from-to) | 79-104 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
ID: 91586149