Defining key concepts for mental state attribution

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 851 KB, PDF document

  • Francois Quesque
  • Ian Apperly
  • Simon Baron-Cohen
  • Cristina Becchio
  • Harold Bekkering
  • Daniel Bernstein
  • Maxime Bertoux
  • Geoffrey Bird
  • Henryk Bukowski
  • Pascal Burgmer
  • Peter Carruthers
  • Caroline Catmur
  • Isabel Dziobek
  • Nicholas Epley
  • Thorsten Michael Erle
  • Chris Frith
  • Uta Frith
  • Carl Michael Galang
  • Vittorio Gallese
  • Delphine Grynberg
  • Franscesca Happé
  • Masahiro Hirai
  • Sara D. Hodges
  • Philipp Kanske
  • Mariska Kret
  • Claus Lamm
  • Jean Louis Nandrino
  • Sukhvinder Obhi
  • Sally Olderbak
  • Josef Perner
  • Yves Rosetti
  • Dana Schneider
  • Matthias Schurz
  • Tobias Schuwerk
  • Natalie Sebanz
  • Simone Shamay-Tsoory
  • Giorgia Silani
  • Shannon Spaulding
  • Andrew R. Todd
  • Evan Westra
  • Marcel Brass
The terminology used in discussions on mental state attribution is extensive and lacks consistency. In the current paper, experts from various disciplines collaborate to introduce a shared set of concepts and make recommendations regarding future use.
Original languageEnglish
Article number29
JournalCommunications Psychology
Volume2
Number of pages5
ISSN2731-9121
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

ID: 391311453