The Emperor's New Markov Blankets

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Emperor's New Markov Blankets. / Bruineberg, Jelle; Dołeȩga, Krzysztof; Dewhurst, Joe; Baltieri, Manuel.

In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 45, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bruineberg, J, Dołeȩga, K, Dewhurst, J & Baltieri, M 2022, 'The Emperor's New Markov Blankets', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21002351

APA

Bruineberg, J., Dołeȩga, K., Dewhurst, J., & Baltieri, M. (2022). The Emperor's New Markov Blankets. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21002351

Vancouver

Bruineberg J, Dołeȩga K, Dewhurst J, Baltieri M. The Emperor's New Markov Blankets. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2022;45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21002351

Author

Bruineberg, Jelle ; Dołeȩga, Krzysztof ; Dewhurst, Joe ; Baltieri, Manuel. / The Emperor's New Markov Blankets. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2022 ; Vol. 45.

Bibtex

@article{08b95d218afd434d9341e3ebda7e8546,
title = "The Emperor's New Markov Blankets",
abstract = "The free energy principle, an influential framework in computational neuroscience and theoretical neurobiology, starts from the assumption that living systems ensure adaptive exchanges with their environment by minimizing the objective function of variational free energy. Following this premise, it claims to deliver a promising integration of the life sciences. In recent work, Markov blankets, one of the central constructs of the free energy principle, have been applied to resolve debates central to philosophy (such as demarcating the boundaries of the mind). The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we trace the development of Markov blankets starting from their standard application in Bayesian networks, via variational inference, to their use in the literature on active inference. We then identify a persistent confusion in the literature between the formal use of Markov blankets as an epistemic tool for Bayesian inference, and their novel metaphysical use in the free energy framework to demarcate the physical boundary between an agent and its environment. Consequently, we propose to distinguish between Pearl blankets to refer to the original epistemic use of Markov blankets and Friston blankets to refer to the new metaphysical construct. Second, we use this distinction to critically assess claims resting on the application of Markov blankets to philosophical problems. We suggest that this literature would do well in differentiating between two different research programmes: Inference with a model and inference within a model. Only the latter is capable of doing metaphysical work with Markov blankets, but requires additional philosophical premises and cannot be justified by an appeal to the success of the mathematical framework alone. ",
keywords = "active inference, Bayesian inference, free energy principle, Markov blankets, scientific realism",
author = "Jelle Bruineberg and Krzysztof Do{\l}eȩga and Joe Dewhurst and Manuel Baltieri",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X21002351",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Emperor's New Markov Blankets

AU - Bruineberg, Jelle

AU - Dołeȩga, Krzysztof

AU - Dewhurst, Joe

AU - Baltieri, Manuel

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The free energy principle, an influential framework in computational neuroscience and theoretical neurobiology, starts from the assumption that living systems ensure adaptive exchanges with their environment by minimizing the objective function of variational free energy. Following this premise, it claims to deliver a promising integration of the life sciences. In recent work, Markov blankets, one of the central constructs of the free energy principle, have been applied to resolve debates central to philosophy (such as demarcating the boundaries of the mind). The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we trace the development of Markov blankets starting from their standard application in Bayesian networks, via variational inference, to their use in the literature on active inference. We then identify a persistent confusion in the literature between the formal use of Markov blankets as an epistemic tool for Bayesian inference, and their novel metaphysical use in the free energy framework to demarcate the physical boundary between an agent and its environment. Consequently, we propose to distinguish between Pearl blankets to refer to the original epistemic use of Markov blankets and Friston blankets to refer to the new metaphysical construct. Second, we use this distinction to critically assess claims resting on the application of Markov blankets to philosophical problems. We suggest that this literature would do well in differentiating between two different research programmes: Inference with a model and inference within a model. Only the latter is capable of doing metaphysical work with Markov blankets, but requires additional philosophical premises and cannot be justified by an appeal to the success of the mathematical framework alone.

AB - The free energy principle, an influential framework in computational neuroscience and theoretical neurobiology, starts from the assumption that living systems ensure adaptive exchanges with their environment by minimizing the objective function of variational free energy. Following this premise, it claims to deliver a promising integration of the life sciences. In recent work, Markov blankets, one of the central constructs of the free energy principle, have been applied to resolve debates central to philosophy (such as demarcating the boundaries of the mind). The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we trace the development of Markov blankets starting from their standard application in Bayesian networks, via variational inference, to their use in the literature on active inference. We then identify a persistent confusion in the literature between the formal use of Markov blankets as an epistemic tool for Bayesian inference, and their novel metaphysical use in the free energy framework to demarcate the physical boundary between an agent and its environment. Consequently, we propose to distinguish between Pearl blankets to refer to the original epistemic use of Markov blankets and Friston blankets to refer to the new metaphysical construct. Second, we use this distinction to critically assess claims resting on the application of Markov blankets to philosophical problems. We suggest that this literature would do well in differentiating between two different research programmes: Inference with a model and inference within a model. Only the latter is capable of doing metaphysical work with Markov blankets, but requires additional philosophical premises and cannot be justified by an appeal to the success of the mathematical framework alone.

KW - active inference

KW - Bayesian inference

KW - free energy principle

KW - Markov blankets

KW - scientific realism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118930372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X21002351

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X21002351

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34674782

AN - SCOPUS:85118930372

VL - 45

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

ER -

ID: 367754982