The inauthenticity of policing: Obedience and oblivion

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The inauthenticity of policing : Obedience and oblivion. / Gyollai, Daniel.

In: Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology, Vol. 16, 2024, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Gyollai, D 2024, 'The inauthenticity of policing: Obedience and oblivion', Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology, vol. 16, pp. 1-14. <http://www.jtpcrim.org/FEB2024/Daniel.pdf>

APA

Gyollai, D. (2024). The inauthenticity of policing: Obedience and oblivion. Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology, 16, 1-14. http://www.jtpcrim.org/FEB2024/Daniel.pdf

Vancouver

Gyollai D. The inauthenticity of policing: Obedience and oblivion. Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology. 2024;16:1-14.

Author

Gyollai, Daniel. / The inauthenticity of policing : Obedience and oblivion. In: Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology. 2024 ; Vol. 16. pp. 1-14.

Bibtex

@article{383f6e723504448da851c081c39dbddc,
title = "The inauthenticity of policing: Obedience and oblivion",
abstract = "Following superior orders or the crowd are commonly used excuses to avoid responsibility. Taking the case of border control in Hungary, this article explores how such inauthenticity can shape police professional identity and practice, both in the Sartrean and Heideggerian sense. It is interested in how police officers 1) have denied their freedom of choice in the face of their role expectations, and 2) have fallen prey to political discourse and anti-immigrant public sentiment. Interestingly, most participants in the study used the phrase “I am just following orders” only in relation to their mandatory deployment at the border but not regarding the ill-treatment of irregular migrants. The concept of excessive use of force no longer appeared to be applicable; physical abuse of migrants has become the norm and standard practice. The findings seem to suggest that officers have been overtaken and driven by public attitudes towards mass migration. The article argues that the real threat to authentic role play does not stem from a desire or temptation to conform. Rather, it manifests itself in dominant discourses that reinterpret the purpose of policing, thus underpinningthe self-understanding of officers.",
author = "Daniel Gyollai",
year = "2024",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology",
issn = "2166-8094",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The inauthenticity of policing

T2 - Obedience and oblivion

AU - Gyollai, Daniel

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Following superior orders or the crowd are commonly used excuses to avoid responsibility. Taking the case of border control in Hungary, this article explores how such inauthenticity can shape police professional identity and practice, both in the Sartrean and Heideggerian sense. It is interested in how police officers 1) have denied their freedom of choice in the face of their role expectations, and 2) have fallen prey to political discourse and anti-immigrant public sentiment. Interestingly, most participants in the study used the phrase “I am just following orders” only in relation to their mandatory deployment at the border but not regarding the ill-treatment of irregular migrants. The concept of excessive use of force no longer appeared to be applicable; physical abuse of migrants has become the norm and standard practice. The findings seem to suggest that officers have been overtaken and driven by public attitudes towards mass migration. The article argues that the real threat to authentic role play does not stem from a desire or temptation to conform. Rather, it manifests itself in dominant discourses that reinterpret the purpose of policing, thus underpinningthe self-understanding of officers.

AB - Following superior orders or the crowd are commonly used excuses to avoid responsibility. Taking the case of border control in Hungary, this article explores how such inauthenticity can shape police professional identity and practice, both in the Sartrean and Heideggerian sense. It is interested in how police officers 1) have denied their freedom of choice in the face of their role expectations, and 2) have fallen prey to political discourse and anti-immigrant public sentiment. Interestingly, most participants in the study used the phrase “I am just following orders” only in relation to their mandatory deployment at the border but not regarding the ill-treatment of irregular migrants. The concept of excessive use of force no longer appeared to be applicable; physical abuse of migrants has become the norm and standard practice. The findings seem to suggest that officers have been overtaken and driven by public attitudes towards mass migration. The article argues that the real threat to authentic role play does not stem from a desire or temptation to conform. Rather, it manifests itself in dominant discourses that reinterpret the purpose of policing, thus underpinningthe self-understanding of officers.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology

JF - Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology

SN - 2166-8094

ER -

ID: 383705937