Background Readings for Keynote Lectures

We encourage you to take a look at the readings before arriving in Copenhagen. The readings are relevant for understanding lectures and will be part of the group discussions; we thus strongly recommend that you read them as preparation for attending the summer school.

Dan Zahavi

• Slaby, J., Heilinger, J.C.: “Lost in Phenospace. Questioning the Claims of Popular Neurophilosophy” Metodo 1/2, 2013. http://www.metodo-rivista.eu/index.php/metodo/article/view/45
  
  
• Zahavi, D.: “Phenomenology and metaphysics.” in D. Zahavi, S. Heinämaa & H. Ruin (eds.): Metaphysics, Facticity, Interpretation. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht-Boston 2003, 3-22. https://www.academia.edu/8705573/Phenomenology_and_Metaphysics

Shaun Gallagher

• Malafouris, L. (2008). "At the potter’s wheel: An argument for material agency", in  Knappett, C., & Malafouris, L. (Eds.). Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. Springer Science & Business Media (pp. 19-36).
  You can find it here: http://cogprints.org/6402/1/agencybook-02_malafouris.pdf

• Fiebich, A. and Gallagher, S. (2013). "Joint attention in joint action", Philosophical Psychology 26 (4): 571-87.
  You can find it here: http://philpapers.org/archive/FIEJAI

Giovanna Colombetti

• Colombetti, G. & Krueger, J. (2014). "Scaffoldings of the affective mind", Philosophical Psychology 28 (8): 1157-1176.

• Colombetti, G. & Roberts, T. (2015). "Extending the extended mind: the case for extended affectivity", Philosophical Studies 172 (5): 1243-1263.

John J. Drummond

• Drummond, J. (2009). "Feelings, Emotions, and Truly Perceiving the Valuable", The Modern Schoolman 86: 363–79.

• Drummond, J. (2013). "The Intentional Structure of the Emotions", Logical Analysis and the History of Philosophy/Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse 16: 244–263.

Søren Overgaard

• Romano, C. (2012). "Must phenomenology remain Cartesian?", Continental Philosophy Review 45: 425-445. You can find it here: https://www.academia.edu/2043355/Must_Phenomenology_remain_Cartesian

• Staiti, A. (2015). "On Husserl’s alleged Cartesianism and conjunctivism: A Critical Reply to Claude Romano", Husserl Studies 31: 123-141. You can find it here: https://www.academia.edu/9488973/On_Husserls_Alleged_Cartesianism_and_Conjunctivism._A_Critical_Reply_to_Claude_Romano

Note: You will need an academia.edu account (free of charge) to access some of the readings.

To read the keynote abstracts, see the Summer School Programme.