Differential-diagnostic confusion and non-specificity of affective symptoms and anxiety: An empirical study of first-admission patients
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Differential-diagnostic confusion and non-specificity of affective symptoms and anxiety: An empirical study of first-admission patients. / Mølstrøm, Ida-Marie; Henriksen, Mads Gram; Nordgaard, Julie .
In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 291, 113302, 2020.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential-diagnostic confusion and non-specificity of affective symptoms and anxiety: An empirical study of first-admission patients
AU - Mølstrøm, Ida-Marie
AU - Henriksen, Mads Gram
AU - Nordgaard, Julie
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In everyday clinical work, psychiatrists encounter patients who present with symptoms spanning several diagnostic categories, e.g., showing signs of a psychosis, depression, and anxiety. This raises the critical question of which symptoms hold precedence over other and, by extension, which diagnosis is the right diagnosis. ICD-10 and DSM-5 do not provide unambiguous answers to this question and therefore psychiatry remains exposed to diagnostic disagreement with consequences for treatment and research.We explored symptom distribution in a sample of 98 first-admission psychiatric patients. We extracted and categorized singular symptoms into symptom domains: anxiety, mania, delusions, hallucinations, first-rank symptoms, and negative symptoms. Most symptoms were seen in most disorders. We found symptoms of depression and anxiety in almost all patients. Thus, just counting symptoms do not seem to be a valid way to make diagnoses. We elaborately discuss these issues in the context of the differential-diagnosis between schizophrenia and depression. Finally, we suggest that a combination of a criteria- and Gestalt-based approach to diagnosing mental disorders may contribute to counteract some of the current differential-diagnostic confusion.
AB - In everyday clinical work, psychiatrists encounter patients who present with symptoms spanning several diagnostic categories, e.g., showing signs of a psychosis, depression, and anxiety. This raises the critical question of which symptoms hold precedence over other and, by extension, which diagnosis is the right diagnosis. ICD-10 and DSM-5 do not provide unambiguous answers to this question and therefore psychiatry remains exposed to diagnostic disagreement with consequences for treatment and research.We explored symptom distribution in a sample of 98 first-admission psychiatric patients. We extracted and categorized singular symptoms into symptom domains: anxiety, mania, delusions, hallucinations, first-rank symptoms, and negative symptoms. Most symptoms were seen in most disorders. We found symptoms of depression and anxiety in almost all patients. Thus, just counting symptoms do not seem to be a valid way to make diagnoses. We elaborately discuss these issues in the context of the differential-diagnosis between schizophrenia and depression. Finally, we suggest that a combination of a criteria- and Gestalt-based approach to diagnosing mental disorders may contribute to counteract some of the current differential-diagnostic confusion.
U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113302
DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113302
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32763555
VL - 291
JO - Psychiatry Research
JF - Psychiatry Research
SN - 0165-1781
M1 - 113302
ER -
ID: 245322232