How We Feel: Collective Emotions Without Joint Commitments

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

How We Feel: Collective Emotions Without Joint Commitments. / León, Felipe; Zahavi, Dan.

In: ProtoSociology - An International Journal and Interdisciplinary Project, Vol. 35 , 2019, p. 117-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

León, F & Zahavi, D 2019, 'How We Feel: Collective Emotions Without Joint Commitments', ProtoSociology - An International Journal and Interdisciplinary Project, vol. 35 , pp. 117-134.

APA

León, F., & Zahavi, D. (2019). How We Feel: Collective Emotions Without Joint Commitments. ProtoSociology - An International Journal and Interdisciplinary Project, 35 , 117-134.

Vancouver

León F, Zahavi D. How We Feel: Collective Emotions Without Joint Commitments. ProtoSociology - An International Journal and Interdisciplinary Project. 2019;35 :117-134.

Author

León, Felipe ; Zahavi, Dan. / How We Feel: Collective Emotions Without Joint Commitments. In: ProtoSociology - An International Journal and Interdisciplinary Project. 2019 ; Vol. 35 . pp. 117-134.

Bibtex

@article{86febb353a474a42a50f8b38d1f0f018,
title = "How We Feel: Collective Emotions Without Joint Commitments",
abstract = "This article engages critically with Margaret Gilbert{\textquoteright}s proposal that joint commitments are necessary for collective emotions. After introducing Gilbert{\textquoteright}s concept of joint commitment (Section 2), and the joint commitment account of collective emotions (Section 3), we argue in Section 4 that research from developmental psychology challenges the necessity of joint commitments for collective emotions. In that section, we also raise a more principled objection to Gilbert{\textquoteright}s account, independently of developmental considerations. Section 5 develops a complementary line of argument, focused on the notion of mutual recognition. While we agree with Gilbert that mutual recognition has an important role to play in an account of collective emotions, we take issue with her attempt to analyse face-to-face based mutual recognition in terms of the concept of joint commitment. We conclude by sketching an alternative analysis of collective emotions that highlights the role of interpersonal identification and socially mediated self-consciousness.",
author = "Felipe Le{\'o}n and Dan Zahavi",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "35 ",
pages = "117--134",
journal = "ProtoSociology (Online)",
issn = "1611-1281",
publisher = "Protosociology og Philosophy Documentation center",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How We Feel: Collective Emotions Without Joint Commitments

AU - León, Felipe

AU - Zahavi, Dan

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article engages critically with Margaret Gilbert’s proposal that joint commitments are necessary for collective emotions. After introducing Gilbert’s concept of joint commitment (Section 2), and the joint commitment account of collective emotions (Section 3), we argue in Section 4 that research from developmental psychology challenges the necessity of joint commitments for collective emotions. In that section, we also raise a more principled objection to Gilbert’s account, independently of developmental considerations. Section 5 develops a complementary line of argument, focused on the notion of mutual recognition. While we agree with Gilbert that mutual recognition has an important role to play in an account of collective emotions, we take issue with her attempt to analyse face-to-face based mutual recognition in terms of the concept of joint commitment. We conclude by sketching an alternative analysis of collective emotions that highlights the role of interpersonal identification and socially mediated self-consciousness.

AB - This article engages critically with Margaret Gilbert’s proposal that joint commitments are necessary for collective emotions. After introducing Gilbert’s concept of joint commitment (Section 2), and the joint commitment account of collective emotions (Section 3), we argue in Section 4 that research from developmental psychology challenges the necessity of joint commitments for collective emotions. In that section, we also raise a more principled objection to Gilbert’s account, independently of developmental considerations. Section 5 develops a complementary line of argument, focused on the notion of mutual recognition. While we agree with Gilbert that mutual recognition has an important role to play in an account of collective emotions, we take issue with her attempt to analyse face-to-face based mutual recognition in terms of the concept of joint commitment. We conclude by sketching an alternative analysis of collective emotions that highlights the role of interpersonal identification and socially mediated self-consciousness.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 117

EP - 134

JO - ProtoSociology (Online)

JF - ProtoSociology (Online)

SN - 1611-1281

ER -

ID: 203770721