Thought insertion and disturbed for-me-ness (minimal selfhood) in schizophrenia

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Thought insertion and disturbed for-me-ness (minimal selfhood) in schizophrenia. / Henriksen, Mads Gram; Parnas, Josef; Zahavi, Dan.

In: Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 74, 102770, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Henriksen, MG, Parnas, J & Zahavi, D 2019, 'Thought insertion and disturbed for-me-ness (minimal selfhood) in schizophrenia', Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 74, 102770.

APA

Henriksen, M. G., Parnas, J., & Zahavi, D. (2019). Thought insertion and disturbed for-me-ness (minimal selfhood) in schizophrenia. Consciousness and Cognition, 74, [102770].

Vancouver

Henriksen MG, Parnas J, Zahavi D. Thought insertion and disturbed for-me-ness (minimal selfhood) in schizophrenia. Consciousness and Cognition. 2019;74. 102770.

Author

Henriksen, Mads Gram ; Parnas, Josef ; Zahavi, Dan. / Thought insertion and disturbed for-me-ness (minimal selfhood) in schizophrenia. In: Consciousness and Cognition. 2019 ; Vol. 74.

Bibtex

@article{f2c34a45938a4152821c3de79057c776,
title = "Thought insertion and disturbed for-me-ness (minimal selfhood) in schizophrenia",
abstract = "In contemporary consciousness research, we have defended a position of experiential minimalism, arguing that for-me-ness (or minimal selfhood) is a necessary, universal feature of phenomenal consciousness. The concept of for-me-ness refers to the fact that experiences are given first-personally to the subject of experience. To challenge the universality of for-me-ness, several authors have referred to the case of thought insertion as a clear counter example. In this study, we address and refute the claim that episodes of thought insertion represent examples of experiences lacking for-me-ness. We highlight certain unaddressed methodological and psychopathological problems that tend to hamper philosophical discussions of thought insertion. Although thought insertion does not involve a lack of for-me-ness, we do argue that thought insertion involves a disturbed for-me-ness. Finally, we offer a novel account of how for-me-ness is disturbed in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and we discuss how a disturbed for-me-ness may be involved in the formation of thought insertion.",
author = "Henriksen, {Mads Gram} and Josef Parnas and Dan Zahavi",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
journal = "Consciousness and Cognition",
issn = "1053-8100",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thought insertion and disturbed for-me-ness (minimal selfhood) in schizophrenia

AU - Henriksen, Mads Gram

AU - Parnas, Josef

AU - Zahavi, Dan

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In contemporary consciousness research, we have defended a position of experiential minimalism, arguing that for-me-ness (or minimal selfhood) is a necessary, universal feature of phenomenal consciousness. The concept of for-me-ness refers to the fact that experiences are given first-personally to the subject of experience. To challenge the universality of for-me-ness, several authors have referred to the case of thought insertion as a clear counter example. In this study, we address and refute the claim that episodes of thought insertion represent examples of experiences lacking for-me-ness. We highlight certain unaddressed methodological and psychopathological problems that tend to hamper philosophical discussions of thought insertion. Although thought insertion does not involve a lack of for-me-ness, we do argue that thought insertion involves a disturbed for-me-ness. Finally, we offer a novel account of how for-me-ness is disturbed in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and we discuss how a disturbed for-me-ness may be involved in the formation of thought insertion.

AB - In contemporary consciousness research, we have defended a position of experiential minimalism, arguing that for-me-ness (or minimal selfhood) is a necessary, universal feature of phenomenal consciousness. The concept of for-me-ness refers to the fact that experiences are given first-personally to the subject of experience. To challenge the universality of for-me-ness, several authors have referred to the case of thought insertion as a clear counter example. In this study, we address and refute the claim that episodes of thought insertion represent examples of experiences lacking for-me-ness. We highlight certain unaddressed methodological and psychopathological problems that tend to hamper philosophical discussions of thought insertion. Although thought insertion does not involve a lack of for-me-ness, we do argue that thought insertion involves a disturbed for-me-ness. Finally, we offer a novel account of how for-me-ness is disturbed in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and we discuss how a disturbed for-me-ness may be involved in the formation of thought insertion.

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31276908

VL - 74

JO - Consciousness and Cognition

JF - Consciousness and Cognition

SN - 1053-8100

M1 - 102770

ER -

ID: 223569083